a perspective on PR in social housing and regeneration

Trouble for Times: hacking gives Harding a headache

There were some highly uncomfortable moments at The Leveson Inquiry today for The Times editor James Harding, who apologised after one of his reporters was found to have hacked into an email account to unmask anonymous police blogger DC Richard Horton (aka Nightjack).

Harding told the inquiry he ‘sorely regrets’ not disclosing the actions of his former media correspondent Patrick Foster at a High Court hearing into a privacy injunction brought by Horton against the paper. The hearing found in favour of The Times.

If you watch him on video at today’s hearing, sore is not the word for it. An editor of a newspaper like The Times publicly apologising over a hacking incident is significant enough. But there are elements to this that border on jaw-dropping and raise serious questions about the management of the paper.

Why, for example, did Harding not grasp the full details of this case until last week – after the hearing had taken place? He admitted he had been copied into email correspondence that revealed the hacking, but did not read it fully. It was a lengthy email and his focus was on other pressing stories, the inquiry heard.

Why was the hacking not disclosed at the High Court, which heard Horton’s identity was uncovered by journalistic tenacity and piecing together bits of publicly available information?

Why did it matter so much that the identity of Horton be known? The High Court ruling had serious implications for him and raises issues for those who blog anonymously. But, whatever you think about whether he should have been blogging, there can be no public interest defence that justifies breaking the law to identify him. Harding admitted this today.

He also said:

“I am sure that Mr Horton and many other people expect better of The Times. So do I.”

I can imagine how The Times would react if a business leader or politician had made such admissions over something as potentially serious.

This piece in The New Statesman is worth reading for anyone who wants to understand a bit more about this issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

SPeye Joe (Welfarewrites)

Joe Halewood writes about tenant and welfare wrongs

Barney's Blog

Regeneration, Development, Economics, Cities


from the National Trust archaeology team in the Stonehenge & Avebury World Heritage Site

Insight. Ideas. Influence.

a blog about adapting to the digital age

A Cup of Lee

Digital Communications in Ireland

Photos from here, there and everywhere

Pictures I've taken, images I like

Colin Wiles

Commentary on current housing and planning issues

Awesome Screenshot

The Easiest Way To Communicate With Images

Man in the Krowd

Talking Openly, Speaking Privately

4,000 bricks

A place for housing, communications and political debate

AdeCapon's Blog

All things digital, marketing, football and happenings

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

A blog about better decisions, better urban planning and better economics

John Wade

Joining up the planks

Simon Rogers

Data journalism and other curiosities

David Higgerson

Journalism, online, random thinking

Connecting Social Care and Social Media

Sharing resources to promote the use of Social Media in Social Care

John Popham's Random Musings

"Just trying to matter"

The Housing Blog

It's about housing, stupid

Rob Jefferson

Web & Digital Manager for @MyDoncaster | Outdoor adventurer by feet, peddles & paddles

nick atkin

A collection of random views on housing, technology & running

%d bloggers like this: